He is often asked when Corona will be over and everything will return to normal. His answer: “Never. There are historical moments when the future changes direction. We call them bifurcations. Or deep crises. These times are now.”
The world as we know it is just dissolving. But behind it, a new world is coming together whose shape we can at least guess at. To this end, he offers an exercise with which his Future Institute (Zukunftsinstitut) has had good experience in vision processes in companies. They call it the RE Gnose. In contrast to PRO-Gnose, this technology does not look “into the future”. Rather, you look BACK from the future into the present.
The Re-Gnose: Our world in September 2020
To do this, imagine a situation in autumn, for example in September 2020, sitting in a street café in a big city. It’s warm and people are moving around on the street. Are they moving differently? Is everything the same as before? Does the wine, the cocktail, the coffee taste the same again? Like before Corona? Or even better? What will people wonder about in retrospect?
“We will be surprised that the social sacrifices we had to make seldom led to loneliness. “On the contrary. After an initial state of shock, many of us were even relieved that all the running, talking, communicating on multichannels suddenly came to a halt. Renunciations do not necessarily mean loss, but can even open up new possibilities. This has been experienced by many people who tried interval fasting, for example – and suddenly enjoyed the food again. Paradoxically, the physical distance forced by the virus simultaneously created new proximity. We got to know people we would otherwise never have met. We contacted old friends more often again, strengthened ties that had become loose and slack. Families, neighbours, friends, moved closer and sometimes even resolved hidden conflicts.” The social politeness that had been increasingly missed before had increased.
We will be surprised how quickly cultural techniques of the digital suddenly proved themselves in practice. Tele- and video-conferencing, which most colleagues had always resisted (the business plane was better), turned out to be quite practical and productive. Teachers learned a lot about internet teaching. The home office became a matter of course for many – including the improvising and time juggling that goes with it.
At the same time, seemingly outdated cultural techniques experienced a renaissance. Suddenly, you didn’t just catch the answering machine when you called, but real people. The virus brought about a new culture of making long calls without a second screen. Even the “messages” themselves suddenly took on a new meaning. People were communicating for real again. You didn’t let anyone fidget any more. You didn’t string people along anymore. Thus a new culture of accessibility and commitment was created.
People who were never at rest because of the hectic pace of life, including young people, suddenly went for long walks (a word that had been rather foreign to them before). Reading books suddenly became a cult.
Reality shows suddenly seemed embarrassing. The whole trivia-trash, the endless soul garbage that was pouring through all channels. No, it didn’t disappear completely. But it lost value rapidly.
Does anyone remember the political correctness controversy? The endless culture wars over… yeah, what were they about?
The main effect of crises is that they dissolve old phenomena, make them superfluous…
Cynicism, that casual way of keeping the world at arm’s length by devaluation, was suddenly abundantly out. The exaggerated fear-hysteria in the media was, after a short initial outburst, contained. Besides, the endless flood of cruel crime series reached its tipping point.
We will be surprised that in the summer, medicine was finally found which increased the survival rate. This reduced the death rate and Corona became a virus that we just have to deal with – similar to the flu and the many other diseases. Medical progress helped. But we have also learned: it wasn’t so much the technology but the change in social behavior that was the key. The fact that people were able to remain in solidarity and constructive despite radical restrictions was the decisive factor. Human-social intelligence helped. In contrast, the much-vaunted artificial intelligence, which is known to be able to solve everything, only had a limited effect in the matter of corona.
This has shifted the relationship between technology and culture. Before the crisis, technology seemed to be the panacea
We will be surprised that in the summer, medicine that increased the survival rate was found after all. This reduced the death rate and Corona became a virus that we just have to deal with – similar to the flu and the many other diseases. Medical progress helped. But we have also learned: it wasn’t so much the technology but the change in social behavior that was the key. The fact that people were able to remain in solidarity and constructive despite radical restrictions was the decisive factor. Human-social intelligence helped. In contrast, the much-vaunted artificial intelligence, which is known to be able to solve everything, only had a limited effect in the matter of corona.
This has shifted the relationship between technology and culture. Before the crisis, technology seemed to be the panacea, the carrier of all utopias. Today, no one – or only a few hard-boiled people – still believe in the great digital salvation. The great technology hype is over. We are once again directing our attention more to the humane questions: What is man? What are we for each other?
We marvel backwards at how much humour and humanity actually developed in the days of the virus.
We will be amazed how far the economy could shrink without something like “collapse” actually happening, which was previously conjured up with every tax increase, no matter how small, and every state intervention. Although there was a “black April”, a deep economic slump and a 50 percent stock market slump, although many companies went bankrupt, shrank or mutated into something completely different, it never came to zero. It was as if the economy was a breathing being that could also doze or sleep and even dream.
Today in autumn, there is a global economy again. But the global just-in-time production, with huge branched value chains, where millions of individual parts are carted across the planet, has survived. It is being dismantled and reconfigured. Everywhere in the production and service facilities, intermediate storage facilities, depots, reserves are growing again. Local productions are booming, networks are being localized, and craftsmanship is experiencing a renaissance. The global system is drifting towards globalization: localization of the global.
We will be surprised that even the loss of wealth due to the stock market slump does not hurt as much as it felt in the beginning. In the new world, wealth suddenly no longer plays the decisive role. More important are good neighbours and a thriving vegetable garden.
Could it be that the virus has changed our lives in a direction that it wanted to change anyway?
RE-Gnose: coping with the present by leaping into the future
Why does this type of “from the front” scenario seem so irritatingly different from a classic forecast? It has to do with the specific characteristics of our sense of the future. When we look “into the future”, we usually only see the dangers and problems “coming towards us”, which pile up to form insurmountable barriers. Like a locomotive coming out of a tunnel and running over us. This barrier of fear separates us from the future. This is why horror futures are always the easiest to depict.
Re-Gnoses, on the other hand, form a knowledge loop in which we include ourselves, our inner change, in the calculation of the future. We connect inwardly with the future, and this creates a bridge between today and tomorrow. A “Future Mind” – awareness of the future – is created.
If you do this correctly, something like future intelligence is created. We are able to anticipate not only the external “events” but also the internal adaptations with which we react to a changed world.
This feels quite different from a prognosis, which in its apodictic character always has something dead, sterile. We leave the rigidity of fear and get back into the liveliness that belongs to every true future.
We all know the feeling of a successful overcoming of fear. When we go to the dentist for treatment, we are worried long before. We lose control in the dentist’s chair and it hurts before it even hurts. In anticipation of this feeling, we escalate into fears that can completely overwhelm us. However, once we have survived the procedure, we get the coping feeling: the world seems young and fresh again and we are suddenly full of energy.
Coping means “to deal with”. Neurobiologically, the fear adrenaline is replaced by dopamine, a kind of endogenous future drug. While adrenaline guides us to escape or fight (which is not really productive in the dentist’s chair, just like in the fight against corona), dopamine opens our brain synapses: We are curious, curious, anticipating. When we have a healthy dopamine level, we make plans, have visions, which bring us into foresighted action.
Surprisingly, many people in the Corona crisis experience exactly this. A massive loss of control suddenly turns into a veritable rush of positivity. After a period of bewilderment and fear, an inner strength develops. The world “ends”, but in the experience that we are still here, a kind of newness arises within.
In the middle of the shutdown of civilization we walk through forests or parks, or over almost empty places. But this is not an apocalypse, but a new beginning.
This is how it turns out: change begins as a changed pattern of expectations, of perceptions and world connections. Sometimes it is precisely the break with routines, with the familiar, that releases our sense of the future. The idea and certainty that everything could be completely different – even for the better.
Perhaps we will even be surprised that Trump will be voted out of office in November. The AFD is showing serious signs of fraying, because a vicious, divisive policy does not fit into a corona world. In the Corona crisis it became clear that those who want to set people against each other have nothing to contribute to real questions about the future. When things get serious, the destructive power that resides in populism becomes clear.
Politics in its primal sense as the formation of social responsibilities gave this crisis a new credibility, a new legitimacy. Precisely because it had to act “authoritatively”, politics created trust in society. Science, too, has experienced an astonishing renaissance in the probation crisis. Virologists and epidemiologists became media stars, but also “futuristic” philosophers, sociologists, psychologists, anthropologists, who had previously been on the fringes of polarized debates, regained voice and weight.
Fake news, on the other hand, rapidly lost market value. Even conspiracy theories suddenly looked like slow sellers, although they were offered like sour beer.
A virus as an evolutionary accelerator…
Deep crises also point to another basic principle of change: The trend-counter-trend synthesis.The new world after corona – or better with corona – is emerging from the disruption of the megatrend connectivity. Politically and economically, this phenomenon is also called “globalization”. However, the disruption of connectivity – through border closures, separations, sealing-off, quarantines – does not lead to the elimination of connections. Rather, it leads to a reorganization of the connectivities that hold our world together and carry it into the future. There is a phase shift in the socio-economic systems.
The coming world will again appreciate distance – and precisely because of this will make connectedness more qualitative. Autonomy and dependence, opening and closing, will be re-balanced. This can make the world more complex, but at the same time more stable. This transformation is largely a blind evolutionary process – because the one fails, the new, viable, prevails. This makes you dizzy at first, but then it proves its inner meaning: Sustainable is that which connects the paradoxes on a new level.
This process of complexation – not to be confused with complication – can also be consciously designed by people. Those who can do this, who speak the language of the coming complexity, will be the leaders of tomorrow. The becoming bearers of hope. The coming GRETAS.
“Through Corona we will adjust our entire attitude towards life – in the sense of our existence as living beings in the midst of other life forms.” – Slavo Zizek at the height of the corona crisis in mid-March
This is how it turns out: change begins as a changed pattern of expectations, of perceptions and world connections. Sometimes it is precisely the break with routines, with the familiar, that releases our sense of the future. The idea and certainty that everything could be completely different – even for the better.
Perhaps we will even be surprised that Trump will be voted out of office in November. The AFD is showing serious signs of fraying, because a vicious, divisive policy does not fit into a corona world. In the Corona crisis it became clear that those who want to set people against each other have nothing to contribute to real questions about the future. When things get serious, the destructive power that resides in populism becomes clear.
Politics in its primal sense as the formation of social responsibilities gave this crisis a new credibility, a new legitimacy. Precisely because it had to act “authoritatively”, politics created trust in society. Science, too, has experienced an astonishing renaissance in the probation crisis. Virologists and epidemiologists became media stars, but also “futuristic” philosophers, sociologists, psychologists, anthropologists, who had previously been on the fringes of polarized debates, regained voice and weight.
Fake news, on the other hand, rapidly lost market value. Even conspiracy theories suddenly looked like slow sellers, although they were offered like sour beer.
Every deep crisis leaves behind a story, a narrative that points far into the future. One of the strongest visions left behind by the coronavirus are the Italians playing music on the balconies. The second vision is sent to us by satellite images that suddenly show the industrial areas of China and Italy free of smog. In 2020, humanity’s CO&sub2; emissions will fall for the first time. This fact will do something to us.
If the virus can do that – can we possibly do that? Maybe the virus was just a messenger from the future. Its drastic message is that human civilization has become too dense, too fast, too overheated. It’s racing too fast in a direction where there is no future.
But it can reinvent itself. System reset. Cool down! Music on the balconies!
This is how the future works.
Author: Matthias Horx
(www.horx.com, www.zukunftsinstitut.de)
(Thank you for the kind permission to use the german version of the article) – Johanna Wenninger-Muhr, Editor Visioinsblog.info.